Positive and negative Androgyny in addition to their Relationship with Psychological Health and Well-Being

Positive and negative Androgyny in addition to their Relationship with Psychological Health and Well-Being

A special variety of rating the new Longer Individual Qualities Questionnaire (EPAQ) was applied to evaluate the fresh constructs of positive and negative androgyny. The brand new EPAQ is applied to 196 adult gents and ladies; their responses was indeed classified on the a differentiated androgyny. Extreme distinctions was in fact received between negative and positive androgynous individuals as the well as anywhere between positive and negative female and positive and negative male anyone on a couple of methods out-of emotional health insurance and well-getting. These results hold the validity and you may electricity off differentiating androgyny with the negative and positive types of gender role term.


Antill, J., Cunningham, J. (1979). Self-esteem due to the fact a purpose of manliness both in men and women. Log out of Contacting and you may Logical Psychology, 47, 783-785.

Antill, J., Cunningham, J., Russell, G., Thompson, N. (1981). An enthusiastic Australian Sex Part Measure. Australian Journal away from Therapy, 33, 169-183.

Baril, Grams., Elbert, Letter., Maher-Potter, S., Reavy, G. (1989). Are androgynous managers extremely more efficient? Category and you will Organization Degree, 14, 234-249.

Bem, S. (1977). Into the electricity from alternative actions to the determining regarding emotional androgyny, Log from Asking and you may Systematic Psychology, forty five, 196-203.

Boswell, H. (1997). This new transgender paradigm change to your 100 % free term. For the B. Bullough, V. Bullough, J. Elias (Eds.), Sex blending (pp. 53-57). Amherst, NY: Prometheus.

Cheng, C. (1999). Sex role variations in sensitiveness towards the influence away from service availability to the anxiety. Record away from Character, 67, 439-467.

Fey, W. (1955). Enjoy because of the other people and its regards to acceptance regarding care about and you can others: An excellent revaluation. Diary of Abnormal and you may Societal Therapy, fifty, 274-276.

Eco-friendly, B., Kendrick, D. (1994). The fresh new attractiveness of sex method of qualities during the different relationship account: Androgynous functions is fashionable anyway. Diary regarding Personality and Personal Therapy, 20, 244-253.

Heilbrun, A great. (1981a). Intercourse variations in the functional linkage between androgyny, personal cognition, and competence. Diary off Personality and you will Personal Therapy, 41, 1106-1118.

Helmreich, R., Stapp, J. (1974). Small particular the Colorado Public Behavior List, a goal way of measuring mind-value. Bulletin of the Psychometric Society, 4, 473-475.

Hoffman, Roentgen. (2001). The aspect out of masculinity and you can femininity: Historic direction and ramifications to own counselling. Record of Therapy and you can Development, 79, 472-485.

Jaccard, J., Wan, C., Turrisi, R. (1990). The new detection and you can interpretation from telecommunications consequences between continuous parameters inside the multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioural Search, twenty-five, 467-478.

Jones, W., Chernovetz, M., Hansson, Roentgen. (1978). The brand new enigma from androgyny: Differential effects for males and women. Record out-of Contacting and you can Systematic Psychology, 46, 298-313.

Kelly, J., Worrell, J. (1977). The latest preparations getting sex spots and androgyny: A life threatening review. Record from Scientific and Contacting Mindset, forty-five, 1101-1115.

Kirchemeyer, C. (1996). Gender opportunities and decision making for the demographically diverse communities: An incident getting revitalizing androgyny. Gender Spots, 34, 49-663.

Kopper, B., Epperson, D. (1996). The experience and you will phrase regarding outrage. Relationships that have gender character socialization, depression and you will mental health performing. Record out-of Asking Psychology, 43, 58-165.

Lenney, E. (1991). Sex spots: New dimension out of maleness, womanliness, and you can androgyny. When you look at the J. Robinson, D. Razor, L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Procedures out-of personality and public mental perceptions (pp. 573-660). North park, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Lubinski, D., Tellegen, An excellent., Butcher, J. (1981). The relationship between androgyny and you will subjective symptoms regarding psychological better-getting. Log out-of Personality and Public Psychology, 40, 722-730.

Lubinski, D., Tellegen, A great., Butcher, J. (1983). Masculinity, womanliness and you can androgyny viewed and you may examined due to the fact line of concepts. Diary away from Personality and you can Societal Psychology, 49, 428-439.

s, C. (1989). Androgyny and its own relation to teenage mental really-being: A review of the fresh literature. Sex Jobs, 21, 25-341.

Will get, A beneficial., Spangenberg, J. (1997). Androgyny and you may coping when you look at the guys with an effective managerial orientation. Southern area African Diary from Mindset, twenty seven, 244-249.

Mead, B., Ignico, Good. (1992). Child’s intercourse published attitudes out-of physical activity: Consequences and implications. Perceptual and Motor Enjoy, 75, 1035-1013.

Nowicki, S., Duke., Meters. (1981). The fresh new Nowicki-Strickland Life span Locus off Handle Scales: Construct recognition. Into the H. Meters. Lefcourt (Ed.), Lookup towards locus regarding handle build (Vol. dos, pp. 16-43). New york: Educational Press.

O’Heron, C., Orlofsky, J. (1990). Stereotypic and you will low-stereotypic sex part characteristic and you can decisions orientations, gender title and you will emotional variations. Journal of Identity and you will Social Therapy, 58, 134-143.

Pearson, J., Cooks, L. (1995). Sex and you will electricity. Within the P. Yards. Kalbfleisch Yards. J. Cody (Eds.), Gender, stamina, and you can telecommunications within the peoples relationships (pp. 331-349). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Robinson, J., Shaver, D., Wrightsman, L. anastasiadate app (1991). Actions out of character and personal psychological perceptions. North park, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Flower, Good., Montemayor, Roentgen. (1994). The partnership anywhere between sex part direction and you can detected worry about-proficiency inside male and female adolescents. Sex Positions, 29, 579-595.

Russell, G., Antill, J. (1984). An Australian gender-part measure: A lot more psychometric study and correlations which have notice-value. Australian Psychologist, 19, 13-18.

Sawrie, S., Watson P., Biderman, M. (1991). Hostility, intercourse character methods and you will Kohut’s mindset of one’s worry about. Gender Opportunities, 25, 41-161.

Schullo, S., Alperson, B. (1984). Interpersonal phenomenology as the a purpose of intimate orientation, intercourse, sentiment, and you will trait kinds when you look at the long haul dyadic matchmaking. Record away from Identity and you will Societal Psychology, 47, 983-1002.

Get unmarried blog post

Razor, P., Papilia, D., Clark, C., Koski, L., Tidwell, M., Nalbare, D. (1996). Androgyny and you can connection safety: One or two related type maximum identity. Personality and you may Personal Therapy Bulletin, 22, 582-597.

Shimonaka, Y., Nakazato, K., Kawaai, C., Shinichi, S. (1997). Androgyny and you may successful version across the expected life certainly Japanese people. Log off Genetic Therapy, 158, 389-401.

Skoe, Age. (1995). Gender part direction and its particular relationship to the introduction of identity and you will moral consider. Scandinavian Record away from Psychology, thirty six, 235-245.

Spence, J. (1984). Manliness, womanliness, and gender-associated traits: A conceptual study and you may criticism from most recent research. Progress when you look at the Fresh Personality Browse, thirteen, 1-97.

Spence, J. (1999). 3 decades off intercourse look: Your own chronicle. During the W. Swann Jr., J. Langlois, L. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes inside modern society: New sex technology regarding erican Emotional Connection.

Spence, J., Buckner, C. (2000). Instrumental and you can expressive faculties, attribute stereotypes, and you can sexist thinking: What do they denote? Mindset of females Quarterly, twenty-four, 44-62.

Spence, J., Helmreich, Roentgen., Holahan, C. (1979). Negative and positive parts of mental manliness and you may femininity in addition to their link to mind-profile out of neurotic and you may acting-out routines. Log off Character and you may Social Psychology, 37, 1673-1682.

Spence, J., Helmreich, Roentgen., Stapp, J. (1974). The non-public Features Questionnaire: A way of measuring intercourse part stereotypes and manliness-femininity. JSAS List off Chose Documents when you look at the Mindset, cuatro, 43-49.

Stake, J. (1997). Integrating expressiveness and you can instrumentality in real world setup: Yet another position for the benefits associated with androgyny. Sex Opportunities, 37, 541-564.

Taylor, M., Hallway, J. (1982). Mental androgyny: An assessment and you can reformulation of the theories, tips, and you can results. Psychological Bulletin, ninety-five, 347-366.

Western, C., Zimmerman, D. (2000). Starting sex. For the Yards. Kimmel (Ed.), The brand new gendered people reader (pp. 131-149). Ny: Oxford College or university Force.

Whitley, B. (1983). Gender part positioning and notice-esteem: A critical meta-analytical review, Log of Identity and you may Public Therapy, forty-two, 765-778.

Woodhill, B., Samuels, C. (inside force). Trendy and you may unwanted androgyny: A prescription for the twenty-very first millennium. Journal regarding Gender Degree.

Wulff, Meters., Steitz, J. (1999). A road brand of the relationship anywhere between profession indecision, androgyny, self-efficacy and notice-value. Perceptual and you may System Skills, 88, 935-940.

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert